This article is available also in spanish here

Pedestrianizing cities: Yes, but with alternatives

My list

*Author | Patricia M. Liceras

Pedestrianizing historic city centers is becoming increasingly common. The aim is to dethrone the car as the king of the city center in order to provide more areas for pedestrians, walkers and cyclists, reduce air pollution and create opportunities that allow new and closer relationships to be established between residents.

In fact, the “15-minute city” concept has gained popularity recently, defended by Anne Hidalgo, the Mayor of Paris. These are cities in which one can fulfil all their professional, educational, health, leisure or any other requirements, with short journeys from home, either on foot or on a bike. Particularly in the future post-COVID era, which will lead to the full emergence of teleworking and the subsequent reduction of journeys from home to the office and vice versa.

However, with this form of urban planning, which reduces or blocks car access. Is it all good news? Are there any downsides?

Advantages of pedestrianization


Pedestrianizing cities is an unstoppable trend at a global level and it does bring with it many advantages. It not only improves road safety, since most fatal accidents involving pedestrians and cyclists take place in city centers, but it also increases pedestrian mobility, which has undoubtable positive effects on the health of the population.

It also reduces pollution and improves the quality of life of residents and pedestrians, with less environmental noise, improved air quality and more spaces for green areas and socializing.

And of course, with wider sidewalks, people tend to walk more and can access stores more easily, which boosts commerce in the new pedestrian areas, and increases the value of property, which benefits owners.

Disadvantages of pedestrianization


However, replacing asphalt with cobblestones in order to make cities more pleasant for their residents and more respectful with the planet, is not a miracle tool devoid of disadvantages. Disadvantages tend to arise when cars are eradicated from cities, by means of a municipal ordinance, without proper planning and execution, and without offering suitable mobility options for thousands of affected people.

On the one hand, residents in these areas tend to use their cars in their day to day activities and restricting the use of their vehicles may lead, not only to the residents opposing these types of measures, but may even cause them to move to other areas of the city without traffic limitations. As a result, houses would be occupied mainly by students, temporary tenants and tourists, displacing the original population. Therefore, these processes must be flexible for residents, avoiding falling into a sense of leniency, which would diminish the effectiveness of the pedestrianization, but without strictness either, which could leave these places bare of their normal residents.

Convincing mobility options should also be offered to other groups that are particularly affected: residents of the suburbs who work in the center, since their journey to work would be greatly affected. Options which, among other aspects, should include boosting and extending the public transport network.

Furthermore, when an area is shut off to four-wheeled traffic, these vehicles do not just disappear as if by magic, instead, they end up concentrating on nearby roads, normally leading to traffic jams, air and noise pollution, car parking and traffic congestion, etc. Therefore, existing traffic flows must be carefully studied, to ensure the proposed restructuring plans do not saturate the surrounding areas.

Disadvantages that could be mitigated if the projects are managed with the right precision. Therefore, the pros do seem to far outweigh the cons, when it comes to living in cities that prioritize pedestrians over cars. The issue would not be whether or not to pedestrianize them, but rather how to avoid pedestrianizing them in a disorganized manner or just because it is in vogue.

Images | Jan Antonin Kolar, Julian Tong, Kilian Seiler

Related Content

Recommended profiles for you

Remember to activate your profile to network!
Activate profile
Adolfo Monterroso
Adolfo Monterroso
Somos una Empresa que brindamos asesorías y consultorías en la temática de Discapacidad.
Jaime Gragera
Diputación de Badajoz
Director del Área de Transformación Digital y Turismo
Abdurahiman Chalil
Digital Bridge International
Managing Director
Daniele Ornaghi Sant Anna
Daniele Ornaghi Sant Anna
Federal University of Itajubá
Joan Erakit
A digital media platform reinventing the way we see each other, one story at a time.
Diego fernandez Valentin
Diego fernandez Valentin
El chema contratistas
Gabor Csaba Sooki-Toth
Gabor Csaba Sooki-Toth
University of Gyor
Assistant Professor
Jenifer Lee Johnson
Jenifer Lee Johnson
StoryMind Inc.
Founder and creative director
Jolanta Kramer
Linden Alley sp. z o.o.
Director of Business Development
Cinthya Quispe Maica
Travel agent
Tânia Mateus
Tânia Mateus
CM Loures
Social Sciences Technician at the Planning Office of Loures Town Hall
Christian Jessie  Bala
Christian Jessie Bala
Global Institute for Youth Development
Vice President for Socio-Civic Engagements
Yolanda Pérez
fariba amighi
tehran municipality information and information organization
technical expert
Akshay Aman
Asma Aadhar
Shotaro Oyama
Sumitomo Corporation
Innovation Team Leader of SmartCity Development Project
Richard Forster
Cities Today
Managing Director
Shahena Khan
Urban & Social Development Professional
Expert- Social Innovation in low-income settlements, Community-led Development, Urban Development
cristina castellano

Thank you for registering to Tomorrow.City. You can now start exploring all the content for free!
Only accessible for registered users
This content is available only for registered users
TO: $$toName$$
SUBJECT: Message from $$fromName$$