This article is available also in spanish here

Pedestrianizing cities: Yes, but with alternatives

My list

*Author | Patricia M. Liceras

Pedestrianizing historic city centers is becoming increasingly common. The aim is to dethrone the car as the king of the city center in order to provide more areas for pedestrians, walkers and cyclists, reduce air pollution and create opportunities that allow new and closer relationships to be established between residents.

In fact, the “15-minute city” concept has gained popularity recently, defended by Anne Hidalgo, the Mayor of Paris. These are cities in which one can fulfil all their professional, educational, health, leisure or any other requirements, with short journeys from home, either on foot or on a bike. Particularly in the future post-COVID era, which will lead to the full emergence of teleworking and the subsequent reduction of journeys from home to the office and vice versa.

However, with this form of urban planning, which reduces or blocks car access. Is it all good news? Are there any downsides?

Advantages of pedestrianization

PIC 1

Pedestrianizing cities is an unstoppable trend at a global level and it does bring with it many advantages. It not only improves road safety, since most fatal accidents involving pedestrians and cyclists take place in city centers, but it also increases pedestrian mobility, which has undoubtable positive effects on the health of the population.

It also reduces pollution and improves the quality of life of residents and pedestrians, with less environmental noise, improved air quality and more spaces for green areas and socializing.

And of course, with wider sidewalks, people tend to walk more and can access stores more easily, which boosts commerce in the new pedestrian areas, and increases the value of property, which benefits owners.

Disadvantages of pedestrianization

PIC 2

However, replacing asphalt with cobblestones in order to make cities more pleasant for their residents and more respectful with the planet, is not a miracle tool devoid of disadvantages. Disadvantages tend to arise when cars are eradicated from cities, by means of a municipal ordinance, without proper planning and execution, and without offering suitable mobility options for thousands of affected people.

On the one hand, residents in these areas tend to use their cars in their day to day activities and restricting the use of their vehicles may lead, not only to the residents opposing these types of measures, but may even cause them to move to other areas of the city without traffic limitations. As a result, houses would be occupied mainly by students, temporary tenants and tourists, displacing the original population. Therefore, these processes must be flexible for residents, avoiding falling into a sense of leniency, which would diminish the effectiveness of the pedestrianization, but without strictness either, which could leave these places bare of their normal residents.

Convincing mobility options should also be offered to other groups that are particularly affected: residents of the suburbs who work in the center, since their journey to work would be greatly affected. Options which, among other aspects, should include boosting and extending the public transport network.

Furthermore, when an area is shut off to four-wheeled traffic, these vehicles do not just disappear as if by magic, instead, they end up concentrating on nearby roads, normally leading to traffic jams, air and noise pollution, car parking and traffic congestion, etc. Therefore, existing traffic flows must be carefully studied, to ensure the proposed restructuring plans do not saturate the surrounding areas.

Disadvantages that could be mitigated if the projects are managed with the right precision. Therefore, the pros do seem to far outweigh the cons, when it comes to living in cities that prioritize pedestrians over cars. The issue would not be whether or not to pedestrianize them, but rather how to avoid pedestrianizing them in a disorganized manner or just because it is in vogue.

Images | Jan Antonin Kolar, Julian Tong, Kilian Seiler

Related Content

Recommended profiles for you

Remember to activate your profile to network!
Activate profile
YP
Yolanda Pérez
ESDAP
Student
KL
Karina Lavik
Nordic Edge Expo
Communications Manager
danny ko
danny ko
Sara Saez Garcia Saez Garcia
Sara Saez Garcia Saez Garcia
whitepaperby.com
writer
Sergi Sarmiento Faba
Sergi Sarmiento Faba
At all Interesting
Now a days? My position is null. I would like to be in this Fair to know where I can go! My picture
RK
Riddhima Khedkar
IES College of Architecture
Assistant Professor
JE
Juan Manuel Escobar DiazGranados
Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Sport diplomacy / public diplomacy advisor
Oksana Kosenko
Oksana Kosenko
Awake s.r.o
CEO
SC
Silvia Cuenca
EL CONSORCI ZONA FRANCA
Events Project Manager
Néstor Cabañas
Néstor Cabañas
Ajuntament de L'Hospitalet
Project manager
Federico  Gigena Sobrero
Federico Gigena Sobrero
Wedell Travel
CEO
Rutwik Reddy Karra
Rutwik Reddy Karra
VNIT
4th Year
Karla França
Karla França
National Confederation of Municipalities CNM
Analyst (CNM), Ph.D, in Geography and Researcher at University of Brasilia UnB/Brazil.
CM
Carmen Molinares
Prixmasol SAS
Project Manager
LT
Luiza Tereza
Mg
Specialist in public policies and government management
Jerome Dulin
Jerome Dulin
North Luzon Cinema Guild, Inc.
Managing Directpr
MB
Mostafa Borhan Limoudehi
Lanza
manager
VB
Varun Bhagath
Quantela
Marketing and PR Manager - Quantela
EG
ELI GATANELA
E. GATANELA REALTY CO.
CEO
PC
Paola Cavallo
L.u.m.s.s.a.
I work for the social resrarch

SmartCity
Thank you for registering to Tomorrow.City. You can now start exploring from your computer, or with your phone or tablet downloading our app!
Only accessible for registered users
This content is available only for registered users
TO: $$toName$$
SUBJECT: Message from $$fromName$$